Identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/11328
Characteristics of patients making serious inhaler errors with a dry powder inhaler and association with asthma-related events in a primary care setting
Identifiers
ISSN: 0277-0903
eISSN: 1532-4303
WOS ID: 000373515900013
Scopus EID: 2-s2.0-84958038358
PMID: 26810934
Embase PUI: L608395467
Share
Statistics
Item usage statisticsMetadata
Show Dublin Core item recordAuthor
Westerik, Janine A. M.; Carter, Victoria; Chrystyn, Henry; Burden, Anne; Thompson, Samantha L.; Ryan, Dermot; Gruffydd-Jones, Kevin; Haughney, John; Roche, Nicolas; Lavorini, Federico; Papi, Alberto; Infantino, Antonio; Roman-Rodriguez, Miguel
Publication date
2016-03-15Document type
research articleCitation
Westerik Janine AM, Carter V, Chrystyn H, Burden A, Thompson SL, Ryan D, et al. Characteristics of patients making serious inhaler errors with a dry powder inhaler and association with asthma-related events in a primary care setting. J Asthma. 2016 Mar 15;53(3):321-9. Epub 2016 Jan 26.Abstract
Objective: Correct inhaler technique is central to effective delivery of asthma therapy. The study aim was to identify factors associated with serious inhaler technique errors and their prevalence among primary care patients with asthma using the Diskus dry powder inhaler (DPI). Methods: This was a historical, multinational, cross-sectional study (2011-2013) using the iHARP database, an international initiative that includes patient- and healthcare provider-reported questionnaires from eight countries. Patients with asthma were observed for serious inhaler errors by trained healthcare providers as predefined by the iHARP steering committee. Multivariable logistic regression, stepwise reduced, was used to identify clinical characteristics and asthma-related outcomes associated with 1 serious errors. Results: Of 3681 patients with asthma, 623 (17%) were using a Diskus (mean [SD] age, 51 [14]; 61% women). A total of 341 (55%) patients made 1 serious errors. The most common errors were the failure to exhale before inhalation, insufficient breath-hold at the end of inhalation, and inhalation that was not forceful from the start. Factors significantly associated with 1 serious errors included asthma-related hospitalization the previous year (odds ratio [OR] 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.40); obesity (OR 1.75; 1.17-2.63); poor asthma control the previous 4 weeks (OR 1.57; 1.04-2.36); female sex (OR 1.51; 1.08-2.10); and no inhaler technique review during the previous year (OR 1.45; 1.04-2.02). Conclusions: Patients with evidence of poor asthma control should be targeted for a review of their inhaler technique even when using a device thought to have a low error rate.
Publisher version
https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1099160MeSH
AsthmaAged
Age Factors
Equipment Design
Adult
Educational Status
Humans
Middle Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Male
Dry Powder Inhalers
Sex Factors
Administration, Inhalation
Female
Risk Factors
Body Mass Index
Odds Ratio
Primary Health Care
Prevalence
Logistic Models
DeCS
Índice de Masa CorporalModelos Logísticos
Oportunidad Relativa
Prevalencia
Femenino
Administración por Inhalación
Masculino
Factores Sexuales
Estudios Transversales
Factores de Riesgo
Humanos
Persona de Mediana Edad
Escolaridad
Factores de Edad
Anciano
Asma
Diseño de Equipo
Atención Primaria de Salud
Adulto
Inhaladores de Polvo Seco
This item appears in following Docusalut collections
Atención Primaria de Mallorca - APMALL > Comunicación científicaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Islas Baleares - IDISBA > Comunicación científica