Identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/12287
Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.236
ISSN: 0007-0920
eISSN: 1532-1827
WOS ID: 000409230100016
Scopus EID: 2-s2.0-85028818110
PMID: 28787432
Embase PUI: L618200218
Share
Statistics
Item usage statisticsMetadata
Show Dublin Core item recordPublication date
2017-09-05Document type
research articleCitation
Torring ML, Murchie P, Hamilton W, Vedsted P, Esteva M, Lautrup M, et al. Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries. Br J Cancer. 2017 Sep 05;117(6):888-97. Epub 2017 Aug 8.Abstract
Background: The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval. Methods: We identified seven independent data sets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11 720 newly diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Data sets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual data sets and, using the same method, analysed a pooled individual patient data set. Results: The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined data set. There was a statistically significant convex (boolean AND-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e., distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P = 0.004), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care, we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (boolean OR-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific 'safe' waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.
Publisher version
https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.236MeSH
EnglandAged, 80 and over
Aged
Denmark
Spain
Adult
Datasets as Topic
Symptom Assessment
Humans
Middle Aged
Canada
Early Detection of Cancer
Male
Referral and Consultation
Time Factors
Scotland
Female
Delayed Diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms
Cohort Studies
Primary Health Care
DeCS
Estudios de CohortesNeoplasias Colorrectales
Factores de Tiempo
Femenino
Canadá
Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto
Evaluación de Síntomas
Masculino
Escocia
Humanos
Persona de Mediana Edad
Derivación y Consulta
Anciano
Diagnóstico Tardío
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Detección Precoz del Cáncer
Atención Primaria de Salud
Adulto
Dinamarca
Inglaterra
España
This item appears in following Docusalut collections
Hospital Universitario Son Espases - HUSE > Comunicación científicaAtención Primaria de Mallorca - APMALL > Comunicación científica
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Islas Baleares - IDISBA > Comunicación científica