Identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/15207
Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study
Identifiers
DOI: 10.3390/nu11112616
eISSN: 2072-6643
WOS ID: 000502274600067
Scopus EID: 2-s2.0-85074547273
PMID: 31683850
Embase PUI: L2003233767
Share
Statistics
Item usage statisticsMetadata
Show Dublin Core item recordAuthor
Luisa Bordeje, M.; Montejo, Juan C.; Lidon Mateu, M.; Solera, Manuel; Acosta, Jose A.; Juan, Mar; Garcia-Cordoba, Francisco; Garcia-Martinez, Miguel A.; Gastaldo-Simeon, Rosa
Publication date
2019-11Document type
research articleCitation
Bordeje ML, Montejo JC, Lidon MM, Solera M, Acosta JA, Juan M, et al. Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study. Nutrients. 2019 Nov;11(11):2616.Abstract
To determine whether elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with a higher rate of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications; to assess the value of IAP as a predictor of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation requiring at least 5 days of EN were recruited for a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study. EN was performed and GI complications were managed with an established protocol. IAP was determined via a urinary catheter. Patients who developed any GI complications were considered as presenting EN intolerance. Variables related to EN, IAP and GI complications were monitored daily. Statistical analysis compared patients without GI complications (group A) vs. GI complications (group B). 247 patients were recruited from 28 participating ICUs (group A: 119, group B: 128). No differences between groups were recorded. Patients in group B (p < 0.001) spent more days on EN (8.1 +/- 8.4 vs. 18.1 +/- 13.7), on mechanical ventilation (8.0 +/- 7.7 vs. 19.3 +/- 14.9) and in the ICU (12.3 +/- 11.4 vs. 24.8 +/- 17.5). IAP prior to the GI complication was (14.3 +/- 3.1 vs. 15.8 +/- 4.8) (p < 0.003). The best IAP value identified for EN intolerance was 14 mmHg but it had low sensitivity and specificity. Although a higher IAP was associated with EN intolerance, IAP alone did not emerge as a good predictor of EN intolerance in critically ill patients.
Publisher version
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112616Keywords
enteral nutritionenteral nutrition intolerance
gastrointestinal complications
intensive care unit
intra-abdominal pressure
MeSH
AbdomenAged
Critical Care
Humans
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Middle Aged
Enteral Nutrition
Pressure
Intensive Care Units
Male
Biomarkers
Prospective Studies
Critical Illness
Female
Respiration, Artificial
DeCS
BiomarcadoresEnfermedad Crítica
Femenino
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
Masculino
Nutrición Enteral
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales
Humanos
Persona de Mediana Edad
Cuidados Críticos
Estudios Prospectivos
Abdomen
Anciano
Presión
Respiración Artificial
This item appears in following Docusalut collections
Hospital de Manacor - HMAN > Comunicación científicaRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Choice of the initial antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive individuals in the era of integrase inhibitors
Alejos, Belen; Suarez-Garcia, Ines; Bisbal, Otilia; Antonio Iribarren, Jose; Asensi, Victor; [et al.] (research article. 2019-08-26)