Identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/16553 Global variation in anastomosis and end colostomy formation following left-sided colorectal resection
Loading...
Identifiers
ISSN: 2474-9842
DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50138
WOS ID: 000473810300019
Scopus EID: 2-s2.0-85078321341
PMID: 31891112
Embase PUI: L2003542012
Authors
Bhangu, Aneel
GlobalSurg Collaborative
Advisors
Share
Date of defense
Publication date
2019-06
Document type
research article
Citation
Bhangu A, GlobalSurg Collaborative. Global variation in anastomosis and end colostomy formation following left-sided colorectal resection. BJS Open. 2019 Jun;3(3):403-14.
Volume Title
Abstract
Background: End colostomy rates following colorectal resection vary across institutions in high-income settings, being influenced by patient, disease, surgeon and system factors. This study aimed to assess global variation in end colostomy rates after left-sided colorectal resection. Methods: This study comprised an analysis of GlobalSurg-1 and -2 international, prospective, observational cohort studies (2014, 2016), including consecutive adult patients undergoing elective or emergency left-sided colorectal resection within discrete 2-week windows. Countries were grouped into high-, middle- and low-income tertiles according to the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI). Factors associated with colostomy formation versus primary anastomosis were explored using a multilevel, multivariable logistic regression model. Results: In total, 1635 patients from 242 hospitals in 57 countries undergoing left-sided colorectal resection were included: 113 (6.9 per cent) from low-HDI, 254 (15.5 per cent) from middle-HDI and 1268 (77.6 per cent) from high-HDI countries. There was a higher proportion of patients with perforated disease (57.5, 40.9 and 35.4 per cent; P<0.001) and subsequent use of end colostomy (52.2, 24.8 and 18.9 per cent; P < 0.001) in low- compared with middle- and high-HDI settings. The association with colostomy use in low-HDI settings persisted (odds ratio (OR) 3.20, 95 per cent c.i. 1.35 to 7.57; P = 0.008) after risk adjustment for malignant disease (OR 2.34, 1.65 to 3.32; P<0.001), emergency surgery (OR 4.08, 2.73 to 6.10; P<0.001), time to operation at least 48h (OR 1.99, 1.28 to 3.09; P = 0.002) and disease perforation (OR 4.00, 2.81 to 5.69; P<0.001). Conclusion: Global differences existed in the proportion of patients receiving end stomas after left-sided colorectal resection based on income, which went beyond case mix alone.
Description
Publisher version
Research data
Referenced by
It is version of
It is versioned by
Keywords
MeSH
Emergencies
Logistic Models
Developing Countries
Developed Countries
Elective Surgical Procedures
Colorectal Neoplasms
Female
Prospective Studies
Multivariate Analysis
Male
Global Health
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Surgical
Adult
Colostomy
Humans
Middle Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Logistic Models
Developing Countries
Developed Countries
Elective Surgical Procedures
Colorectal Neoplasms
Female
Prospective Studies
Multivariate Analysis
Male
Global Health
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Surgical
Adult
Colostomy
Humans
Middle Aged
Aged, 80 and over
DeCS
Países en Desarrollo
Anastomosis Quirúrgica
Urgencias Médicas
Masculino
Análisis Multivariante
Humanos
Persona de Mediana Edad
Femenino
Colostomía
Estudios Prospectivos
Anciano
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Modelos Logísticos
Neoplasias Colorrectales
Salud Global
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos
Países Desarrollados
Adulto
Anastomosis Quirúrgica
Urgencias Médicas
Masculino
Análisis Multivariante
Humanos
Persona de Mediana Edad
Femenino
Colostomía
Estudios Prospectivos
Anciano
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Modelos Logísticos
Neoplasias Colorrectales
Salud Global
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos
Países Desarrollados
Adulto







